TY - JOUR
T1 - Physicochemical Properties of a Bioceramic Repair Material - BioMTA
AU - Coaguila-Llerena, Hernán
AU - Ochoa-Rodriguez, Victor Manuel
AU - Castro-Núñez, Gabriela Mariana
AU - Faria, Gisele
AU - Guerreiro-Tanomaru, Juliane Maria
AU - Tanomaru-Filho, Mario
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Associacao Brasileira de Divulgacao Cientifica. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/9/1
Y1 - 2020/9/1
N2 - This study aimed to assess the physicochemical properties of a repair material in the Brazilian market, BioMTA, in comparison to other two materials currently in use (Biodentine and MTA Angelus). The initial setting time was evaluated using Gillmore needle. The pH was measured with a pH-meter after 24 h, 3, 7, 14 and 21 days. The radiopacity was determined using the equivalence in millimeters of aluminum (mm Al) from digitized occlusal radiographs. Solubility was determined after immersion in water for 7 days. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (α=0.05). The BioMTA initial setting time (5.2 min) was lower than the other materials (p<0.05). All materials showed an alkaline pH at 21 days. At 24 h, BioMTA was the most alkaline material (p<0.05); and at 3, 7, 14 and 21 days there was no difference between BioMTA and Biodentine (p>0.05), both being more alkaline than MTA Angelus (p<0.05). The radiopacity of BioMTA (4.2 mm Al) was significantly higher compared to Biodentine (p<0.05) and lower than MTA Angelus (p<0.05). The solubility of the materials was-4.2%,-1.6% and 4.1% for BioMTA, MTA Angelus and Biodentine, respectively, with a significant difference between them (p<0.05). Therefore, it can be concluded that BioMTA displayed a shorter setting time, an alkaline pH, a higher radiopacity, and a gain in mass.
AB - This study aimed to assess the physicochemical properties of a repair material in the Brazilian market, BioMTA, in comparison to other two materials currently in use (Biodentine and MTA Angelus). The initial setting time was evaluated using Gillmore needle. The pH was measured with a pH-meter after 24 h, 3, 7, 14 and 21 days. The radiopacity was determined using the equivalence in millimeters of aluminum (mm Al) from digitized occlusal radiographs. Solubility was determined after immersion in water for 7 days. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (α=0.05). The BioMTA initial setting time (5.2 min) was lower than the other materials (p<0.05). All materials showed an alkaline pH at 21 days. At 24 h, BioMTA was the most alkaline material (p<0.05); and at 3, 7, 14 and 21 days there was no difference between BioMTA and Biodentine (p>0.05), both being more alkaline than MTA Angelus (p<0.05). The radiopacity of BioMTA (4.2 mm Al) was significantly higher compared to Biodentine (p<0.05) and lower than MTA Angelus (p<0.05). The solubility of the materials was-4.2%,-1.6% and 4.1% for BioMTA, MTA Angelus and Biodentine, respectively, with a significant difference between them (p<0.05). Therefore, it can be concluded that BioMTA displayed a shorter setting time, an alkaline pH, a higher radiopacity, and a gain in mass.
KW - Biocompatible materials
KW - Physical and chemical properties
KW - Root canal treatment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85095126633&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1590/0103-6440202003163
DO - 10.1590/0103-6440202003163
M3 - Article
C2 - 33146335
AN - SCOPUS:85095126633
SN - 0103-6440
VL - 31
SP - 511
EP - 515
JO - Brazilian Dental Journal
JF - Brazilian Dental Journal
IS - 5
ER -