A Systematic Literature Review of Modalities, Trends, and Limitations in Emotion Recognition, Affective Computing, and Sentiment Analysis

Rosa A. García-Hernández, Huizilopoztli Luna-García, José M. Celaya-Padilla, Alejandra García-Hernández, Luis C. Reveles-Gómez, Luis Alberto Flores-Chaires, J. Ruben Delgado-Contreras, David Rondon, Klinge O. Villalba-Condori

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

This systematic literature review delves into the extensive landscape of emotion recognition, sentiment analysis, and affective computing, analyzing 609 articles. Exploring the intricate relationships among these research domains, and leveraging data from four well-established sources—IEEE, Science Direct, Springer, and MDPI—this systematic review classifies studies in four modalities based on the types of data analyzed. These modalities are unimodal, multi-physical, multi-physiological, and multi-physical–physiological. After the classification, key insights about applications, learning models, and data sources are extracted and analyzed. This review highlights the exponential growth in studies utilizing EEG signals for emotion recognition, and the potential of multimodal approaches combining physical and physiological signals to enhance the accuracy and practicality of emotion recognition systems. This comprehensive overview of research advances, emerging trends, and limitations from 2018 to 2023 underscores the importance of continued exploration and interdisciplinary collaboration in these rapidly evolving fields.

Original languageEnglish
Article number7165
JournalApplied Sciences (Switzerland)
Volume14
Issue number16
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2024

Keywords

  • affective computing
  • emotion recognition
  • sentiment analysis
  • SLR
  • systematic literature review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Systematic Literature Review of Modalities, Trends, and Limitations in Emotion Recognition, Affective Computing, and Sentiment Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this